Showing posts with label Nikki Haley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nikki Haley. Show all posts
Haley defends military husband's Facebook post
COLUMBIA, S.C. — The head of
South Carolina's National Guard said Tuesday he will conduct an internal
review of the Guard's policy on social media use after Gov. Nikki
Haley's husband used Facebook to call members of the state Senate
cowards for not voting on a bill favored by his wife.
Maj. Gen.
Robert Livingston said he spoke with Michael Haley about the matter, and
Michael Haley told the general he intended to express himself as a
private citizen, not as a member of the Guard.
Michael Haley is an officer the South Carolina Army National Guard.
Sen.
Jake Knotts, a Lexington Republican who has often clashed with Gov.
Haley, called late Tuesday for Michael Haley to resign his commission if
he can't abstain from "contentious partisan issues."
In speeches,
Gov. Nikki Haley frequently talks about her husband's military service
and says she is proud that he puts on his uniform daily when he goes to
work.
At a news conference, the governor defended her husband,
saying he made the posting while away from the family and attending two
weeks of military training in Texas.
"He is a person. He is a
citizen. He has the right to get frustrated," Haley said, responding to
calls that Michael Haley apologize for the posting.
Michael
Haley's post came Thursday after the Senate failed to vote on a bill
backed by his wife that would restructure portions of the state
government.
"It amazes me that in a week that we have heroes who
have died fighting for our freedoms, we have cowards who are afraid to
take a vote in the senate," Michael Haley wrote.
Earlier that day, the Guard announced that three S.C. soldiers had been killed in an attack by a suicide bomber in Afghanistan.
"We
reviewed the posting," Livingston said in a telephone interview. "It
was not a partisan expression and he did not express himself as a member
of the military."
Livingston said he wants to ensure that every citizen, including Michael Haley, maintains his freedom of speech.
But
the general noted that Michael Haley has a unique role serving as the
governor's spouse, as well as a lieutenant in the National Guard.
"I think he is very conscious of the stir this has caused," Livingston said.
Livingston
said the military has had to grapple with an "evolving" approach to
social media, and the situation offers a chance for review.
"We
will conduct an internal review and do a wash on the policy that all our
people have to deal with" on social media, Livingston said. "We will
use this as an opportunity to make sure all our people don't step over
the line."
Livingston said he hoped the contretemps does not take
away from the heroism displayed by the three members of the Guard who
gave their lives in Afghanistan.
"We have three real heroes who
have fallen. I don't want us to lose sight of the tremendous sacrifice
that they, and their families, are making," he said.
Knotts
suggested that Michael Haley's action violated the Hatch Act, which
prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political
activity.
"Michael Haley should be ashamed of himself for invoking
the memory of dead soldiers just to make a partisan political point,"
he said in a statement. "As a commissioned officer in the South Carolina
National Guard, Mr. Haley should know that he is not permitted to
engage in partisan rhetoric."
Knotts said that if Michael Haley wants to be involved in politics, he should resign from the military.
"I'm
concerned when a person uses his uniform or position in the military
for political purposes," Knotts said. He said the Facebook post was "an
insult to the families and to the Senate as a whole."
He said Michael Haley should offer apologies to both the soldiers' families and to the Senate.
On
Monday Sumter Sen. Phil Leventis said on the floor of the Senate that
Michael Haley's comment amounted to politics at its worst. He said he
didn't think the three soldiers died for a new South Carolina Department
of Administration.
"I found it difficult that Mr. Haley implied
that he knew what those three wanted. They died as Americans. They
didn't die as Republicans or Democrats," said Leventis, a Democrat who
retired as a brigadier general in the South Carolina Air National Guard
after 30 years in uniform.
After he spoke, Republican colleague
Sen. Chip Campsen of Charleston rose to say Leventis was no coward, and
had 21 combat flights in the Iraq war to his credit.
Leventis said
in a telephone interview Tuesday that he believed Michael Haley
"stepped way out of line" by using the soldiers' deaths to make a point
about a local political issue.
In April, a Marine Corps sergeant in San Diego was discharged for criticizing President Barack Obama on Facebook.
The
military has had a policy since the Civil War limiting the free speech
of service members, including criticism of the commander in chief.
Pentagon
directives say military personnel in uniform cannot sponsor a political
club; participate in any TV or radio program or group discussion that
advocates for or against a political party, candidate or cause; or speak
at any event promoting a political movement.
Fort Mill manager 'retiring' for 2 weeks
Posted by
musicontheradar
0
comments
Subscribe to TruGMusicGroup.com
Follow @TruGProductions on Twitter
Like us on Facebook!
Read more here: http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/06/26/4073618/fort-mill-manager-retiring-for.html#storylink=rss#storylink=cpy
FORT MILL — Town Manager David Hudspeth is retiring Friday. But not for long.
Hudspeth will be rehired by the town in his old position effective July 16 and begin a new, two-year contract that pays the same $99,343 annual salary he earned prior to June 29, when he “retired.” However, like other public employees vested in the state retirement fund who changed their status, Hudspeth, 48, will also begin collecting a monthly pension check for life.
Anticipating drastic changes to the state retirement system – the S.C. Legislature approved an overhaul Aug. 21 – Hudspeth and others moved to take advantage of current rules that allow public employees who have accrued enough time in the system to retire and, after 14 days, become a government worker again without forfeiting any pension payouts.
“Once I started to get to eligibility, I started making plans because [state legislators] were talking about making the kinds of changes to the retirement system that wouldn’t allow employees to work and draw their retirement,” Hudspeth said.
Under the rules that existed prior to last week’s overhaul by S.C. lawmakers, employees needed 28 years of accrued service before they can start drawing their pension. Hudspeth, who was hired as Fort Mill Town Manager in 1997 and had accrued public service time elsewhere in S.C., was actually about six months short of the required 28 years, but the system allowed him to “buy” the remaining time.
He said some his unused vacation time was used as part of the arrangement to get the required 28 years in the system.
The Fort Mill Town Council approved Hudspeth’s new contract on a 7-0 vote at its May 14 meeting. Assistant Town Manager Joe Cronin will be the town’s Interim Manager June 29-July 16.
“We’ll make sure the doors stay open, the lights stay on and hope nothing exciting happens,” Cronin joked.
“The [state] legislation coming in was going to impact him (Hudspeth) in a negative way and if we can find a way to help him, we wanted to do that,” Fort Mill Mayor Danny Funderburk said.
“David has done an outstanding job for us and he certainly deserves it.”
Funderburk also said he thinks it would be difficult to find a new town manager as experienced as Hudspeth who would be willing to work for the same salary.
“If we had to go out on the competitive market, we’d have to pay a lot more,” he said.
Officials said there are no state or local laws they are aware of that would require the town to actually post an opening for the town manager’s position even though it’s technically vacant for two weeks.
“There’s no state law requiring a municipality to open its process if a vacancy occurs. That’s all dictated by local procedures,” said Scott Slatton, senior field service manager for the S.C. Municipal Association.
Lawmakers also killed the controversial TERI program, which allows state workers to retire and return to work for up to five years while they earn both a salary and a retirement check. They also made it much harder for public-sector employers to hire retired workers back to their old jobs. Under the new law, retired employees who return to work would have to forfeit their retirement checks once they earn $10,000 in salary in one year.
And if those public-sector employees – state and local government workers plus teachers – want to buy service time to retire early like Hudspeth did, the price is about to go up significantly.
The S.C. State Employees Association supported the bill but said the TERI and return-to-work programs are not the boogeyman that lawmakers made them out to be.
“TERI is an incentive to get quality employees to come and work for the state,” said Carlton Washington, the association’s executive director.
TERI will be phased out over five years. The return-to-work changes and the “service time” requirements, which allow workers to buy credit for additional years of service, will not go into effect until Jan. 2, 2013. That gives current state workers who are close to retirement six months to make up their mind.
And it could lead to an onslaught of retirement requests.
“What’s the net effect on ‘brain drain’ on state and local agencies?” Slatton asked, rhetorically. “It could prompt a wave of retirements and there’s a dearth of experience around the state – maybe not Fort Mill, but smaller towns for sure – and that means towns having a horrible time finding managers and administrators because there are so few of them.”
Without incentives, qualified workers who would otherwise be attracted to public jobs might opt for the higher-paying private sector instead, leaving many important vacancies in the wake of mass early retirements from government.
“If it’s as widespread and broad as I think it could be, it can point to a lack of people going into government management. It’s good, stable work doing good thing for [the public]; TERI worked well for what it was intended to do,” Slatton said.
Lawmakers have agreed to end the TERI program by 2018 as part of a broader bill designed to encourage employees to work longer before retiring. By working longer, state workers would withdraw less from the state's $25 billion pension fund -- which accountants estimate will run out of money sometime over the next 30 years, falling about $15 billion short.
The House approved the bill 88-9, and the Senate approved the bill 43-0. It now goes to Gov. Nikki Haley, who can sign it into law, veto it or allow it to become law without her signature.
The bill means state workers will pay more, but it should save taxpayers money. The bill requires state workers to match any taxpayer increases to the system, meaning taxpayers and state workers would share in any increases. Right now, taxpayers have to pay for any required increases.
The bill also guarantees an annual 1 percent cost-of-living-adjustment for retirees, capped at $500.
Rep. Jim Merrill, R-Berkeley, who lead the negotiations for the House, called it "a wonderful bill both Democrats and Republicans can feel good about."
However, Merrill was not pleased with all aspects of the bill.
The bill also creates an 11-member Public Employee Benefits Authority that would govern the retirement system. Four of the members would be either retirees or state workers, and all of the members would earn $20,000 annual salaries.
The authority would also make decisions about the employee health insurance plan. Merrill warned that, because the board would make decisions about non-retirement issues, the state Supreme Court could rule the bill unconstitutional under the "one subject" rule.
"It endangers this bill, in our opinion," he said.
But Merrill said the Senate and Gov. Nikki Haley insisted on the authority, and the bill would not have passed without it.
The state’s retirement fund has $25 billion in it. The state uses it to pay monthly retirement checks to retired state workers, teachers, police officers, firefighters and lawmakers. The money in the fund comes from employee contributions, taxpayer contributions and investment returns.
However, over the last decade, the retirement fund has not been able to keep up with the benefits it owes retired state workers for a variety of reasons, including huge investment losses the system sustained during the Great Recession.
Accountants predict that sometime over the next 30 years the retirement fund will run out of money, falling about $15 billion short. To avoid this, state taxpayers would have to pay billions of dollars to make up that shortfall. That’s why lawmakers want to change the law to make state workers contribute more to the system and work longer before they retire.
Reporter Adam Beam of The State newspaper contributed.
Hudspeth will be rehired by the town in his old position effective July 16 and begin a new, two-year contract that pays the same $99,343 annual salary he earned prior to June 29, when he “retired.” However, like other public employees vested in the state retirement fund who changed their status, Hudspeth, 48, will also begin collecting a monthly pension check for life.
Anticipating drastic changes to the state retirement system – the S.C. Legislature approved an overhaul Aug. 21 – Hudspeth and others moved to take advantage of current rules that allow public employees who have accrued enough time in the system to retire and, after 14 days, become a government worker again without forfeiting any pension payouts.
“Once I started to get to eligibility, I started making plans because [state legislators] were talking about making the kinds of changes to the retirement system that wouldn’t allow employees to work and draw their retirement,” Hudspeth said.
Under the rules that existed prior to last week’s overhaul by S.C. lawmakers, employees needed 28 years of accrued service before they can start drawing their pension. Hudspeth, who was hired as Fort Mill Town Manager in 1997 and had accrued public service time elsewhere in S.C., was actually about six months short of the required 28 years, but the system allowed him to “buy” the remaining time.
He said some his unused vacation time was used as part of the arrangement to get the required 28 years in the system.
The Fort Mill Town Council approved Hudspeth’s new contract on a 7-0 vote at its May 14 meeting. Assistant Town Manager Joe Cronin will be the town’s Interim Manager June 29-July 16.
“We’ll make sure the doors stay open, the lights stay on and hope nothing exciting happens,” Cronin joked.
“The [state] legislation coming in was going to impact him (Hudspeth) in a negative way and if we can find a way to help him, we wanted to do that,” Fort Mill Mayor Danny Funderburk said.
“David has done an outstanding job for us and he certainly deserves it.”
Funderburk also said he thinks it would be difficult to find a new town manager as experienced as Hudspeth who would be willing to work for the same salary.
“If we had to go out on the competitive market, we’d have to pay a lot more,” he said.
Officials said there are no state or local laws they are aware of that would require the town to actually post an opening for the town manager’s position even though it’s technically vacant for two weeks.
“There’s no state law requiring a municipality to open its process if a vacancy occurs. That’s all dictated by local procedures,” said Scott Slatton, senior field service manager for the S.C. Municipal Association.
Lawmakers also killed the controversial TERI program, which allows state workers to retire and return to work for up to five years while they earn both a salary and a retirement check. They also made it much harder for public-sector employers to hire retired workers back to their old jobs. Under the new law, retired employees who return to work would have to forfeit their retirement checks once they earn $10,000 in salary in one year.
And if those public-sector employees – state and local government workers plus teachers – want to buy service time to retire early like Hudspeth did, the price is about to go up significantly.
The S.C. State Employees Association supported the bill but said the TERI and return-to-work programs are not the boogeyman that lawmakers made them out to be.
“TERI is an incentive to get quality employees to come and work for the state,” said Carlton Washington, the association’s executive director.
TERI will be phased out over five years. The return-to-work changes and the “service time” requirements, which allow workers to buy credit for additional years of service, will not go into effect until Jan. 2, 2013. That gives current state workers who are close to retirement six months to make up their mind.
And it could lead to an onslaught of retirement requests.
“What’s the net effect on ‘brain drain’ on state and local agencies?” Slatton asked, rhetorically. “It could prompt a wave of retirements and there’s a dearth of experience around the state – maybe not Fort Mill, but smaller towns for sure – and that means towns having a horrible time finding managers and administrators because there are so few of them.”
Without incentives, qualified workers who would otherwise be attracted to public jobs might opt for the higher-paying private sector instead, leaving many important vacancies in the wake of mass early retirements from government.
“If it’s as widespread and broad as I think it could be, it can point to a lack of people going into government management. It’s good, stable work doing good thing for [the public]; TERI worked well for what it was intended to do,” Slatton said.
Lawmakers have agreed to end the TERI program by 2018 as part of a broader bill designed to encourage employees to work longer before retiring. By working longer, state workers would withdraw less from the state's $25 billion pension fund -- which accountants estimate will run out of money sometime over the next 30 years, falling about $15 billion short.
The House approved the bill 88-9, and the Senate approved the bill 43-0. It now goes to Gov. Nikki Haley, who can sign it into law, veto it or allow it to become law without her signature.
The bill means state workers will pay more, but it should save taxpayers money. The bill requires state workers to match any taxpayer increases to the system, meaning taxpayers and state workers would share in any increases. Right now, taxpayers have to pay for any required increases.
The bill also guarantees an annual 1 percent cost-of-living-adjustment for retirees, capped at $500.
Rep. Jim Merrill, R-Berkeley, who lead the negotiations for the House, called it "a wonderful bill both Democrats and Republicans can feel good about."
However, Merrill was not pleased with all aspects of the bill.
The bill also creates an 11-member Public Employee Benefits Authority that would govern the retirement system. Four of the members would be either retirees or state workers, and all of the members would earn $20,000 annual salaries.
The authority would also make decisions about the employee health insurance plan. Merrill warned that, because the board would make decisions about non-retirement issues, the state Supreme Court could rule the bill unconstitutional under the "one subject" rule.
"It endangers this bill, in our opinion," he said.
But Merrill said the Senate and Gov. Nikki Haley insisted on the authority, and the bill would not have passed without it.
The state’s retirement fund has $25 billion in it. The state uses it to pay monthly retirement checks to retired state workers, teachers, police officers, firefighters and lawmakers. The money in the fund comes from employee contributions, taxpayer contributions and investment returns.
However, over the last decade, the retirement fund has not been able to keep up with the benefits it owes retired state workers for a variety of reasons, including huge investment losses the system sustained during the Great Recession.
Accountants predict that sometime over the next 30 years the retirement fund will run out of money, falling about $15 billion short. To avoid this, state taxpayers would have to pay billions of dollars to make up that shortfall. That’s why lawmakers want to change the law to make state workers contribute more to the system and work longer before they retire.
Reporter Adam Beam of The State newspaper contributed.
Read more here: http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/06/26/4073618/fort-mill-manager-retiring-for.html#storylink=rss#storylink=cpy
Related articles
Fort Mill loan company lays off 248
Mail carrier abducted at Fort Mill truck stop
fort mill bed and breakfast
Herald paper carrier abducted from Fort Mill truck stop
2 charged in abduction of Herald paper carrier
York County housing market starts to rise
Fort Mills Red Ventures to hire 400
Can't Beat Cassiday: Amanda Of Fort Mill
Accepting ALS with grace
Businesses 'positive' about removal of default retirement age
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


